[ANSOL-geral]Proposta sobre SL do BE Ú considerada ameša pela m$

Rui Miguel Seabra rms arroba 1407.org
Thu Nov 28 17:57:01 2002

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

O mais interessante =C3=A9 que o link do projecto de lei apontado pelo ISC =

tcham tcham tcham tchaaaaaammmmmm a ANSOL.

Pronto, j=C3=A1 estamos a mira ;)

=C3=89 de salientar a transforma=C3=A7=C3=A3o intencional de Software Livre=
Software, FS) para Software de C=C3=B3digo Aberto (seja l=C3=A1 o que isso =
OpenSource Software, OSS).

O mesmo que fizeram com o Dr. Edgar, no Peru.

S=C3=B3 posso considerar que todos os motivos apresentados em Why ``Free
Software'' is better than ``Open Source''[2] e N=C3=B3s falamos de Software
Livre[3] s=C3=A3o cada vez mais evidentes (especialmente a parte de: Com
Software Livre o abuso =C3=A9 mais dif=C3=ADcil).

E depois h=C3=A1 quem diga que a escolha das palavras/termos n=C3=A3o inter=

Portugal - Preparation of Legislative Proposal - ISC Opposes=20

In late September, members of the left party coalition of the lower
chamber announced at a press conference their intention to submit a
proposal[1] that would require all state institutions and agencies in
which the government is a majority shareholder to exclusively use OSS
for their information systems on the grounds that OSS is cheaper, safer
and more adaptable to user needs.=20

[1] http://www.ansol.org/docs/projecto-lei.pt.html
[2] http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html
[3] http://www.fsfeurope.org/documents/whyfs.pt.html
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)