[ANSOL-geral][Fwd: Re: Amendments (in)acceptable to the commission]
Rui Miguel Seabra
rms arroba 1407.org
Fri Oct 10 10:38:01 2003
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Pelos vistos quem quer as patentes de software, quer patentear coisas no
From: Christian Cornelssen
Subject: Re: Amendments (in)acceptable to the commission
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:12:50 +0200
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Christian Cornelssen wrote:
> "Amendments acceptable in part, in full or after suitable
> "Amendments not acceptable":
1. The order given is suitable for reading through the (annotated)
amended directive proposal.
2. The statement represents the CEC hardline, no wonder.
Among the "unacceptable amendments" you can also find Am.75 which just says=
Recital 18a (new):
At all events, the legislation of the member states must
ensure that patents contain innovations and involve an
inventive step, so as to prevent inventions already in the
public domain from being appropriated simply by being
incorporated into a computer program.
Even to people without software expertise, this should make clear
what the patent establishment is aiming at, and that those
"unacceptable" amendments are absolutely necessary.
 Seth's notion, I prefer it over "patent movement".
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----