[ANSOL-geral][Fwd: Re: Amendments (in)acceptable to the commission]

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

--=-UvTuakE2fCpuNtbtSNiI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Pelos vistos quem quer as patentes de software, quer patentear coisas no
dom=C3=ADnio p=C3=BAblico...

-----Forwarded Message-----
From: Christian Cornelssen
To:=20
Subject: Re: Amendments (in)acceptable to the commission
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:12:50 +0200

Hi again,

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Christian Cornelssen wrote:
> "Amendments acceptable in part, in full or after suitable
> reformulation":
>
> 1,2,3,85,7,8,9,11,12,13,15,16,17,19,76,92,23,25,26,89,27,28.
>
> "Amendments not acceptable":
>
> 88,31,32,112,95,84,114,125,34,115,86,75,36,42,117,107,69,55,97,108,
> 38,44,118,45,100,57,99,110,70,60,102,111,72,103,119,104,120,71,24,81,93,9=
4.

Notes:

1. The order given is suitable for reading through the (annotated)
amended directive proposal.

2. The statement represents the CEC hardline, no wonder.

Among the "unacceptable amendments" you can also find Am.75 which just says=
:

	Recital 18a (new):

	At all events, the legislation of the member states must
	ensure that patents contain innovations and involve an
	inventive step, so as to prevent inventions already in the
	public domain from being appropriated simply by being
	incorporated into a computer program.

Even to people without software expertise, this should make clear
what the patent establishment[1] is aiming at, and that those
"unacceptable" amendments are absolutely necessary.

[1] Seth's notion, I prefer it over "patent movement".

Regards,

Christian Cornelssen

--=20
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

--=-UvTuakE2fCpuNtbtSNiI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/hn2+o+C50no0+t4RAmF9AKCOA+vptWYBoLrRySRf1perkLAENQCeIyQK
hQiKopass820hCtI2pLTza0=
=LsoH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-UvTuakE2fCpuNtbtSNiI--